Fight Night Round 4

avatar

demonic

this game is very fun to play but can get reall frustrating with only analog controls i keep either hitting the pause button on some of my hooks or the center x-box button when the screen pops up the fight is still going on and can't see the screen, just wondering if anyone has had this problem? oh yeah getting up can be a b***h if you have played the game. if you are wondering if you want this game BE READY FOR ONLY ANALOG CONTROLS NO BUTTON BASHING.
avatar

Maukrish

I'm not sure how this game managed to score a 9/10 having purchased this game on the grounds that I really enjoyed FNR3. I found that the control system was frustrating to say the least it's not that the analogue control system is hard to learn but it's un-responsive and has a tendency to get your fighter to throw random punches. From what I understand EA removed the face button controls to even up the online play side of the game but I'm not sure why they didn't leave it for single player mode. Also this game seems to have a number of problems causing the xbox 360 to lock up, which I understand EA are going to try and patch. While the graphics do look fantastic I would have enjoyed it more if the face button controls were left intact and the game worked 100%. I really am getting tired of game developers attitude of release it now patch it later.
avatar

WARPATH360

Please, Please tell me that the punching in Round 4 isn't just anolog only. I, along with other Fight Night fans, will look at it as a huge let down if it is. I know that the analog has always been a part of the Fight Night formula, but it has never been its main focus. Analog only, in my opinion, will make a lot of people shy away from the game and its new found formula. It would be nice if EA can release a patch, shortly after its release, for button support. Then again, that would just be EA milking even more money out of the franchise for DLC. That sucks! WARPATH360/SPC Barthol, Andrew U.S. Army
avatar

cart00nstrip

Dan's math makes me grin. Oh, and I just got the latest issue - awesome cover! ~ gt: cart00nstrip
avatar

Dan OXM (not verified)

Here's how the math works out:

10 - 3yrs + better game = 9.0

avatar

Paul OXM

Yes, what hornerboy said -- exactly that.
avatar

hornerboy73

you cant see it here but in the magazine there is a footnote stating that a 10 in 2006 is not equal to a 10 in 2009
avatar

cart00nstrip

Please disregard my misuse of the word "surely". ~ gt: cart00nstrip
avatar

cart00nstrip

So here's the OBVIOUS question: if 4 is better than 3 in every conceivable way, then why did it only get a score of 9? Granted, your score of 10 for the last one drummed up a lot of controversy, but surely, if 4 is a better game, why did it receive a lower score? ~ gt: cart00nstrip
 
Login with Facebook
Log in using Facebook to share comments and articles easily with your Facebook feed.