Everybody Wants Some!!
I'm looking forward to Guitar Hero: Aerosmith. It seems that most people are either hot or cold on Aerosmith; a lot of people associate them with cheesy movie anthems, but I like their '70s classics as well as their '80s revival. I also respect any band that can stay together for 38 years without losing or changing members. These guys are a band.

"Thank you for the money! You're...amazing! Get it? Good night!"
Whether you like Aerosmith or not, you can't blame Activision for extending the Guitar Hero brand — it's pure power at retail (VGChartz.com reports that GHII and GHIII on Xbox 360 sold about 4.5 million copies combined) and the rabid audience (like me) loves the core experience. And the company knows how to leverage a brand: in addition to Aerosmith, there's the recently announced DS game On Tour, plus the as-yet-unannounced-but-seemingly-inevitable Guitar Hero IV. The Guitar Hero bandwagon is an attractive ride.
But a chill went down my spine when I saw the reports that Activision CEO Bobby Kotick name-dropped not only Aerosmith but also Van Halen in a recent conference call, leading many to speculate that my favorite rock-and-roll band is inking a deal for their own special edition of the GH franchise. It's not that I don't have faith in Neversoft (talented folks, them), and you will certainly never hear me suggest that Eddie Van Halen is anything less than The Greatest Guitar Player To Ever Walk The Earth. My concerns stem from what we might be missing by Van Halen signing an exclusive deal with Guitar Hero. It would shut out Rock Band. And that would be bad.
I'll assume that Kotick's Van Halen comment wasn't just a random example picked out of the air. If it's not an ad-hoc confirmation of a project coming soon, I'd suspect it might have been an engineered slip of the tongue designed to create demand and convince the band to sign a proposed deal — "See? Everybody wants this game, and we didn't even officially announce it!" Plus, VH fans have no doubt noticed that the PS2 controller for GHIII is a Kramer, the same brand Eddie endorsed in the mid-'80s. No accident there.
And let's face it: My favorite band isn't exactly known for its restraint. If someone with a large bank account said "We'll shine the spotlight of our best franchise directly on you," why would they say no? After all, they're Southern California neighbors (consider that it's easier to get together for a business lunch when one party's not in Boston), and you never know when Eddie might return to rehab, or David Lee Roth might leave again, or the whole VH empire might grind to a halt because Wolfgang cut himself while learning to shave. The life of a Van Halen fan is fraught with fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Imagine what it's like for the members.

Admittedly, they look better on the radio.
The problem — from a music lover and fan's perspective, anyway — is that Rock Band is a far better fit for Van Halen. Yes, a Guitar Hero game would let me try my aching hand at replicating incredibly simplified verisons of Eddie's most famous solos...but that's it. (Listen to those bass lines — you don't want to replicate them because they had to be dead simple to give Eddie room to dominate. I love his focused playing, killer harmony vocals, and humble attitude, but nobody dreams of being Michael Anthony.)
But if Van Halen grants Harmonix the rights to use its music in Rock Band, then you insert Alex's incredible drumwork and Dave's (and Sammy's and Gary's) cartoonish, wailing vocals into the mix. The instrumentation of Rock Band is perfect — like Van Halen itself, the game features one vocalist, one guitarist, one bassist, and one drummer. The game would obviously celebrate the band's music, while the band's music really celebrates the Rock Band experience. But if VH really is cooking up a GH deal, this four-player co-op nirvana will never happen. And if full albums are a reality for Nirvana and The Who in Rock Band, what's to stop Van Halen's debut album from appearing on Xbox Live Marketplace? I haven't seen any indication that GH is following suit with that excellent play-the-whole-record idea.

The only way to get Van Halen in Rock Band right now is to DIY.
I'm not saying Van Halen shouldn't be in Guitar Hero — by all means, settle the legal squabbles that reportedly kept anything but a Kinks cover out of Guitar Hero II and bring the music to the fans. But I am saying Van Halen shouldn't be in just Guitar Hero. I want to be able to play the band's music in both game franchises, with no compromises and no single-brand license restrictions. I want the best of both worlds — and as the song goes, honey, I know what it's worth. Does Van Halen?
![]()
Darrin T
March 28, 2008 at 7:25pm
I totally agree. Van Halen is a perfect fit for Rock Band. My family almost always plays Rock Band over Guitar Hero anymore. How great would it be to get Unchained, Here About it Later, Panama, The Full Bug, Little Dreamer, DOA, So This is Love?, Everybody Wants Some and that's off the top of my head. Harmonix bring your fans the 1st 6 Van Halen albums!!!
![]()
shoedog
March 26, 2008 at 9:02pm
I am a huge VH fan and was a drummer for many years, so I can see where people are coming from when wanting VH in Rock Band. However, because EVH is such a guitar icon it kind of makes sense to me that Activision would put all of it's eggs in one basket and run VH through Guitar Hero. One doesn't have to know or like Van Halen, but even my mother knows who Eddie Van Halen is and that he is arguably the greatest guitarist ever.
![]()
RiteNowRiteNow
March 22, 2008 at 9:18pm
Dan nailed it. Van Halen is one of the main bands missing from Rock Band (I know, I know, Zepplin, AC/DC and countless others are too). The game is practically formatted for them, and while I'm not a huge fan I'd love to see their ORIGINAL material represented. If EA has a tough time selling the idea of non-exclusivicity to them (I'm imaginging it's Activision's exclusive deal of VH's own game versus EA's non-exclusive deal of an onslaught of DLC), they need not point anywhere else than to the 6 million downloaded tracks. Or have VH call Metallica and ask how their bank account has been affected by the RB DLC. But, I'd also like to point out that a good number of Van Halen songs in Rock Band would MORE than give "that feeling" to a group of players...that same feeling that made Rock Band OXM's game of the year.
![]()
InvertedSine
March 21, 2008 at 9:00pm
Exclusivity may also be good for the band too. What better pub than having your name platstered on a half a million guitar hero boxes around the country? If it was DLC on both the name has the potential for getting lost in the 100 or so other songs that are out there.
![]()
evh76
March 21, 2008 at 6:49pm
Being a HUGE Van Halen fan myself, it would be great to see both GH and RB have songs, if not full albums, from the Van Halen catalogue. Since the first GH, I've had hopes of playing Eruption, Jump, and many more. Hopefully Eddie will make a deal with both companies and make everyone happy. Also, being able to play some of the nasty drum beats Alex has banged out over the years would be pretty sweet.
![]()
JasonPWhite
March 21, 2008 at 12:41pm
i definitely agree. let's face it - "exclusivity" is only good for the publisher. how about doing something good for the consumer? maybe if we all set our mottos to "makeVHtracks4GHandRB"....
















