Battlefield: Bad Company

I gotta admit, this one was a bit easy.

i just got this game today and DANG if its not fun.

this game is easy and betuiful and plus its not that bad

this story mode of bad company is actualy fun compared to the last battlefields. good job on that.({67})

"You smell very clean" -Haggard
Good game focused mostly on the 'fun'
9/10

Are u allowed to play online under the age of 13 on bad company message back please

Gamertag:ghostmirror

Thank you for Conquest Mode! Its great! I like the map layouts and I've enjoyed it, but I'm really hating that siren that goes off when you get low on reinforcements. COD4 is ntohing like BFBC. Its easier for me anyways to rank up in than it was in COD4. The points just keep coming. The only thing I wish is that I had more friends on my list playing it so I could have more team chat. So many are still in Love with Halo 3 and COD4.

XBox Live: LongDuckDong13

Helicopter controls are sub-par. But overall good game.

I wish they would let you change the controls on BF BC. I can stab someone really fast on COD4 but it really sucks on BF BC.

i have to admit, i wasnt that impressed online. the whole time everything just didnt seem to flow and i hated the health system. it always seemed like one quick burst from an m4 would kill me and it took half of my m16 clip to take sumone down.

the single player is short. but the multiplayer is really fun. it only has one game type but you really have to work as a team and that makes it even more fun.and there is a good amount of achievements

they messed up on the hard and normal achievements on this one. u have to play normal to get that achievement when u beat a chapter on hard. games a waste of time as it is and they want u to play it twice? lame

what a bad game

BF"BAD COMPANY , is an alright game single player was cool and funny, but online stinks to much lag , no mode changes just the same crap just different maps! i give it 5 out 10 because of single player&co-op play.

Really, COD4 and Battlefield:BC weren't going for the same type of multiplayer. On COD4 you basicly take out as many guys as possible, to make your job easier. On Battlefield:BC you take out people, but at the same time you use more teamwork. If you hadn't of healed the guy next to you, I bet he would of died before arming the bomb.. and if you didn't blow up that tank, he would of been a sore in the attack. I would of given it a 9.5. And really, those two games can't really be compared by features, if they weren't aiming for the same type of gameplay.

This is just my opinion but personally, i love the demo. I played it almost daily with my friends, in fact i sometimes chose the BF BC demo over my favorite game COD4. But once you buy the game, it is extremely repetative. Well, on xbox live it is anyways. If u play the demo online and dont care to play one player then the demo should be fine for you. I bought the game and i am bored with it, it is just like the demo OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. If they would have made the online a bit funner i would play this game much more often.

this is a very fun game. DON'T COMPARE IT TO COD 4. They are two different games. The single player is fun. The multiplayer has a bunch of cool weapon unlocks and other stuff. I hope you enjoy it.

Remember all those problems EA had with charging for guns? There not completely gone. Have u looked at the "Find all Five" page at its website? Well in order to get every weapon, u have to do things like play the demo, sign up for newsletters,etc. Now that's all fine, but I was outraged when I saw that to get the assault unlock u have to have & played EVERY Battlefield EVER made!!! 1942, Modern Combat, 2142, Vietnam, & even Road to Rome, & Secret Weapons!!!! I don't know about all of u, but I don't have all those games, & I don't plan on buying them anytime soon. I thought that EA and DICE would have learned their lesson by now & just make all weapons available for free & already in the game, but I guess not.

ok seriously this game is freakin sweet,youve got hardcore action (you can blow up practically anything) youve got sweet AI(on easy not so much but on normal and hard these guys are really smart) then you have hilarious characters, Haggard is the funniest character ive seen in a game in a long time he is seriously crazy and its wat makes him funny now there is really good graphics and pretty good sound except when oyur in a corner or near a wall then the sound kinda has this wierd echo, but i didnt care cause its a fun game and i havnt played multiplayer yet so from just the singleplayer point of view id give it a 9.0 now if the multiplayer is as good as the single player or maybe better id give it a 9.5, the only reason it wouldnt get a 10 is because the easy diffuculty is way too easy, a three year old could beat it

this is truly a great time to be a gamer!
o.k. i'm not going to dispute that cod 4 holds the current undisputed multiplayer crown.but i don't think bf:bc is trying to take that. it is what it is. pick up and play, pure and simple. i'm not awesome but i can throw a much needed medipack to a teammate, or call in a mortar strike to make incoming enimies second guess their approach. i might not rock hard at halo 3 but i can make a difference in bad company

After playing COD4 campaign and comparing it to BF:BC COD is better in my opinion but in multi BF:BC lol.

They should have given it nine

hmmm... anyone have any idea when they are going to allow us to download the conquest match type?

I honestly think playing single player is way better than playing online against other players.call of Duty 4 still rules out!!The old battlefield game Modern combat which i still have it..What they should've done is make this game a Multiplayer missions like ghost Recon games..It'll be funner than going against your friends or someelse..I hear that Call of Duty:world at war will be Co op?hmmm that might suprise those who play cod series..I would want to see CO op on Battlefield as well..For this game:battlefield?well instead of 24 players i believe they can add 100+ players for this huge maps..WOW that would be awesome!!

[url=http://profile.mygamercard.net/da+FartRhino][img]http://card.mygamercard.net/geothermal/da+FartRhino.png[/img][/url]
I found it easier to fly the helicopter if you switch the control scheme to type 2.

yes it is awesome just try it

So since the single player is simple is the multiplayer player worth getting pulled away from COD4

what rez iam running 720p through hdmi with no issue it might be the vga or possibly an issue with the screen but i doubt it if i figure anythin out on that ill keep ya posted but there is a serrious issue with connecting to servers is what it says well after speaking with microsoft you need to clear you 360 cache go to system tab then memory select your highlight your storage area then Y for device options the input X,X,LB,RB,X,X then select yes and that allows you to connect again

I was running through the VGA cable in HD. 24" Samsung HDTV.

hey just out of curisoty what video setting were you running at i have logged over 20 hours already in the demo and full game combined but i have yet to see any horizontal image tearing

i agree. frontlines sucked. at least this game is halfway decent. frontlines only got good reviews cuz i could support so many ppl online. too bad nobody plays it.

I'm not trying to anger anyone, or call out OXM's review crew, but come on, how does Frontlines: Fuel of War get a 9 and Bad Company get an 8?? BF is a much better game.

This game is so awesome!Yet I can't stay away from COD4!

Ironically, "Bee Movie" scored quite well in OXM. I think the reviewer hailed it as an adequate game for its audience - that would, in turn, probably make it unplayable for anyone outside that range. :)

I'd have to agree with something that I found in this month's OXM (letters to ed.): if you have a problem with games that score 7.0-8.0 in a scale of 10, then you should play something rotten (say, "Bee Movie") to rediscover the magic of a solid game that lacks just a few qualities of the greats...

I'm very excited for this game, but your review makes some good points and the score makes perfect sense. Besides, 8/10 is not bad at all.. it's actually a very good score. Great job Mr. Amrich!

Ha,I haven't even Beat the one before this.

Uh, graphics and sound are both really important elements. But the gameplay is very strong, and that's why it got such a positive score like 8.0.

If you read the review and not just the number, I think that's explained...

If you played the game and don't agree with the review why does it matter what they say? There is a demo for everyone to try on live anyway.

These guys are dicks! BF: BC should've gotten atleast a 9.0 if not higher. They only complain about graphics and sound. So thats why it got an 8.0?